Research and innovation
Why sound African surveillance data rarely reaches the design of research calls, and how to move from data sharing to collaborative data use.
The independent interface between the two continents on who decides which health research gets funded and for whom.

African research centres produce sound data on the diseases that weigh most on the continent. Yet the large research programmes still set their priorities largely without them.
Surveillance data, clinical research and field knowledge on the diseases that weigh most.
Strategic plans, work programmes, expert groups and calls for research.
The data exists. The channel does not.
Africa is implementing its science strategy to 2034. Europe is preparing its next research programme, for 2028 to 2034. What both write from 2027 will shape a decade of research.
We bring African institutions into the places where research priorities are set. We turn their priorities into proposals that programme writers on both sides can use.
InterfaceFrom the first conversation to the final decision, we stay with each proposal.
Research institutions, policy actors and field organisations from both continents, around one table.
Their priorities, into the working language of those who write programmes and calls.
Proposals, jointly with the institutions that shaped them.
With the African Union and the European Union, when choices are made.
What becomes of each proposal, reported back to those who wrote it.
Many actors fund, train or deliver once priorities exist. We work earlier, where priorities are written.
After priorities are set: funding, training, delivery.
Before, where priorities are written.
Programmes designed in one place, partners consulted later.
African institutions define the priorities. We build the channel.
One continent's agenda.
Africa and Europe, in both directions.
Reports and declarations.
Policy-ready proposals in the drafters' own language.
A programme to fund or defend.
None. We are independent.
We do not fund or conduct research. We change who sits at the table when it is designed.
Consultation with partners, three working sessions and one framework, launched in Rabat.
Institutions from both continents set out where the system fails and what would fix it.
Online sessions with African and European institutions on research and innovation, policy and governance, financing and deployment.
Ten policy-ready proposals, launched at the Founding Conference.
The proposals go to those who write research programmes in Africa and Europe.
Why sound African surveillance data rarely reaches the design of research calls, and how to move from data sharing to collaborative data use.
Which mechanisms would let African institutions shape strategies and work programmes from the start, expert group membership included.
What it takes for validated interventions to reach national health systems, with data sovereignty as a precondition. This strand yields orientations.
The 2026 conference opens a permanent Africa-Europe platform. Health is its anchor for the years ahead.
A standing place where African and European institutions shape research priorities together, cycle after cycle.
Measuring how far institutions from high-burden settings take part in setting global health research priorities.
Research institutions, global health organisations, civil society and development finance, working as one network.
One day with around fifty senior participants from Africa and Europe, held under non-attribution. The Rabat Framework is launched there.
You work on health research between Africa and Europe, in research, policy, funding or the field? Let's talk.